Less anyone thinks I have it out for Apple and will want to
question my fanboy credentials. The recent issues with quality speak more to
the branding and previous quality of their products. But when it comes to
security issues, Android is significantly worse. There are a number of reasons,
most having to deal with user behavior.
Android is basically an open source operating system,
similar to how Windows was in the eighties and nineties. Given the fact most of
the manufacturers of the smartphones and the tables which use this system
provide some variance of the OS, it limits the effectiveness of security
updates Google might be providing. Additionally, users are reluctant to update
their software to protect themselves. However, Google is attempting to handle
this by working with manufacturers and shrinking the footprint of the Android
operating system. The number of vulnerabilities they were seeing is shrinking
even as the market share of devices running Android is growing. Lastly, some of
the manufacturers are supplementing their devices with additional security such
as Samsung's Knox. "Knox creates a container so that only authorized
personnel can access content within it. All files and data, such as email,
contacts, and browsers are encrypted within the container (Mearian,
2017)."
The larger issue when dealing with application
security is trying to decide if open source better or is a closed network? This
isn't a question I can answer or if I should even try to answer but we do know
is open source software by its very nature allows people to exploit it in a way
they may not be able to do with closed network software.
References:
Mearian, L. (2017, August 07). Android vs iOS
security: Which is better? Retrieved January 29, 2018, from
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3213388/mobile-wireless/android-vs-ios-security-which-is-better.html
Comments
Post a Comment